Clarivate Reviewer Connect, Publons, an outsourced service, or a spreadsheet? See how Prophy compares: automated reviewer matching with conflict-of-interest checks built in, across 60M+ author profiles.
| # | Name | Score | Art. score | Articles | Own works | h-index | Citations | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | J. Andersson | GB | 2.80 | 0.90 | 10 (630) | 546 | 79 | 26 000+ |
| 2 | M. Rossi | IT | 2.67 | 0.91 | 10 (243) | 99 | 25 | 2 500+ |
| 3 | L. Zhang | ES · NL | 2.64 | 0.90 | 10 (143) | 83 | 25 | 2 300+ |
| 4 | C. Dubois | FR | 2.63 | 0.90 | 10 (200) | 112 | 20 | 1 400+ |
Used by 70+ research funders and scientific publishers, including:
Most editorial teams and grant offices arrive from one of four ways of finding reviewers. Here is what Prophy replaces, and with what.
Instead of
Clarivate Reviewer Connect, Web of Science Reviewer Locator, Interfolio. Built for publishers who struggle with enterprise tools that lack a usable interface, and for funders weighed down by cumbersome suites. Prophy automates matching and detects conflicts inline, without the enterprise learning curve.
Instead of
For teams managing peer review by hand, Prophy offers semantic search and monitoring over millions of researcher profiles with AI matching. The result is consistent, high-quality reviewer selection at a scale handwork cannot match.
Instead of
Scopus, Web of Science, Publons, Dimensions. Local databases age between updates. Prophy provides an extensive, continuously maintained pool, including reviewers at 4–10 years of academic age, for access to a larger, current set of experts.
Instead of
For teams relying on unpredictable outsourcing, Prophy provides immediate identification and flagging of potential conflicts of interest during reviewer selection, in-house. That improves credibility and reputation.
We'll run Prophy against a manuscript or proposal you bring and show how the matches and conflict flags compare to your current tool.
Confidentiality
Some teams are building in-house reviewer tools on general-purpose generative AI, feeding confidential manuscripts and proposals into systems that may train on the input. Prophy took a different decision.
Prophy is a focused reviewer-finding tool, not an enterprise suite: it automates semantic matching and flags conflicts inline, without the training-heavy interface or enterprise-suite overhead.
Static citation databases age between updates and miss recently active and early-career experts. Prophy queries a continuously maintained pool, so you reach reviewers a static database has not indexed yet.
Yes. Prophy connects to ScholarOne, Editorial Manager (Aries), eJournal Press, and grant-management systems via API, so suggestions land in the workflow you already run.
Your data belongs to you, and you can delete it at any time or set up lifecycle rules. We also don't train any models on your data.
Every choice carries its co-authorship / co-affiliation basis and an exportable record: the audit trail boards and procurement ask for.
Pricing maps to institutional and public-procurement norms; we'll walk you through what fits your volume rather than point you at a self-serve tier.
