Compose review panels with full subject coverage, defensible diversity, and conflicts of interest flagged at the panel level. For editorial offices and funding agencies that have to defend who's on the panel.
| # | Name | Score | Detailed score | h-index | Citations | Details | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4128 | A. Ferreiramember | f | 512 | 88 | 29 000+ | more | |
| 6390 | K. Nakamuramember | M | 466 | 71 | 18 000+ | less | |
|
Most recent affiliations
| |||||||
| 7815 | T. Okonkwomember | M | 344 | 54 | 9 700+ | more | |
Used by 70+ research funders and scientific publishers, including:
One view of every panel — subject coverage, diversity, and COI, side by side.
See the topical fingerprint of the whole panel — where you're deep, where you're thin, and which proposal subjects don't yet have an expert in the room.
Balance gender, geography, seniority, and academic-vs-industry across the panel. Every adjustment recomputes the coverage map in real time.
Conflicts of interest checked across every applicant against every panel member at once — co-authorship, shared affiliations, advisor links, surfaced inline.
Lost a panel member or short on a topic? Suggest substitutes ranked by semantic match to the gap — drawn from your roster or from 60M+ researchers.
PANEL COMPOSER
| # | Name | Score | Detailed score | h-index | Citations | Details | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4128 | A. Ferreiramember | f | 512 | 88 | 29 000+ | more | |
| 6390 | K. Nakamuramember | M | 466 | 71 | 18 000+ | less | |
|
Most recent affiliations
| |||||||
| 7815 | T. Okonkwomember | M | 344 | 54 | 9 700+ | more | |
PANEL COMPOSER
Head of department of natural sciences and technology
Prophy helps us and our board members to identify and select reviewers for research proposals. Especially for interdisciplinary research proposals Prophy has shown to be a great asset. The finding process is fast and convenient and comparison between suggested reviewers is a huge advantage.
ETH Zurich. Office of Research
Prophy provides a very good basis to find appropriate peer reviewers for the evaluation of applications to our internal funding instruments and saves us a lot of time.