Expert identification and review tooling for scientific publishing and research funding
Find the right reviewers, flag conflicts of interest, and keep your evaluation panels diverse. One platform, built by scientists, serving editorial teams and grant offices across the research world.
| # | Name | Score | Art. score | Articles | Own works | h-index | Citations | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | J. Andersson | GB | 2.80 | 0.90 | 10 (630) | 546 | 79 | 26 000+ |
| 2 | M. Rossi | IT | 2.67 | 0.91 | 10 (243) | 99 | 25 | 2 500+ |
| 3 | L. Zhang | ES · NL | 2.64 | 0.90 | 10 (143) | 83 | 25 | 2 300+ |
| 4 | C. Dubois | FR | 2.63 | 0.90 | 10 (200) | 112 | 20 | 1 400+ |
Used by 70+ research funders and scientific publishers, including:
Find your path
Prophy serves three roles in the research ecosystem. Pick the one that matches your work.
Funding agencies
Assign grant reviewers fast, detect conflicts of interest automatically, and keep panels diverse by gender, geography, and seniority. Built for grant management, innovation, and program teams.
Scientific publishers
Match peer reviewers against 60M+ researcher profiles, surface emerging authors, and flag co-authorship conflicts before the invitation goes out. For editorial and peer-review teams.
Faculty and research offices
Support expert identification and review across your institution's departments. Deeper segment pages are in progress.